An Overview of the Methodology Used to Develop Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Acute and Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury

Global Spine Journal, 2024 · DOI: 10.1177/21925682231215266 · Published: March 1, 2024

Simple Explanation

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are created to help doctors and patients make the best decisions about healthcare. These guidelines are based on a thorough review of research and aim to improve patient outcomes and standardize care. The development of these guidelines involves a multidisciplinary group, including individuals with lived experience of spinal cord injury, to ensure that different perspectives are considered. The guidelines are also reviewed by experts before they are finalized. The GRADE approach is used to determine the strength of the recommendations, considering the quality of evidence, patient preferences, and resource use. The goal is to provide clear and actionable recommendations that can be implemented in clinical practice.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Multidisciplinary guideline development group (GDG) including individuals living with SCI and clinicians from various specialties
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The development of CPGs for SCI followed the methodology proposed by the Institute of Medicine, the Guideline International Network, and the GRADE Working Group.
  • 2
    The CPGs address key questions related to the timing of surgical decompression, hemodynamic management, and identification/management of intraoperative SCI.
  • 3
    The GRADE 'evidence-to-recommendation' framework was used to translate evidence into actionable recommendations, considering factors like benefits, harms, patient values, and resource use.

Research Summary

This article provides an overview of the methodology used to develop clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of acute and intraoperative spinal cord injury (SCI). The development process adhered to standards set by organizations such as the Institute of Medicine and the Guideline International Network, utilizing systematic reviews and the GRADE approach. The resulting CPGs are intended to assist clinicians in implementing evidence-based practices, facilitating shared decision-making, and ultimately improving patient outcomes in SCI management.

Practical Implications

Improved Patient Care

The CPGs are expected to enhance the quality of care provided to patients with SCI by standardizing practices and promoting evidence-based interventions.

Informed Decision-Making

Patients can use the CPGs to better understand their treatment options and participate in shared decision-making with their healthcare providers.

Resource Allocation

Policy makers can utilize the CPGs to inform the allocation of resources, ensuring that healthcare funding is directed towards effective SCI management strategies.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The results of the CPGs are provided in separate articles, so this article only describes the methodology.
  • 2
    The effectiveness of the developed CPGs in improving patient outcomes is yet to be fully evaluated.
  • 3
    The GRADE approach, while rigorous, relies on the quality of existing evidence, which may have inherent limitations.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?