CASE MANAGERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT SYNCHRONOUS TELEREHABILITATION VERSUS CLINIC-BASED PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY
International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2021 · DOI: 10.5195/ijt.2021.6392 · Published: September 1, 2021
Simple Explanation
This study explores the perceptions of workers’ compensation case managers regarding the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous telerehabilitation versus clinic-based physical therapy services for people with SCI. The results showed a significant preference for clinic-based physical therapy services, with relative experience affecting perceptions. Only travel convenience significantly differed as a reason for recommending one service delivery method over the other. The study suggests a need for additional education due to the incongruity between perceptions about telerehabilitation and existing literature about its cost, convenience, and efficacy.
Key Findings
- 1Case managers showed a significant preference for clinic-based physical therapy services over synchronous telerehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injuries.
- 2Experience with the two service delivery models significantly influenced perceptions, suggesting that familiarity plays a crucial role in acceptance.
- 3Travel convenience was the only factor that significantly differentiated recommendations, with telerehabilitation being favored for its convenience.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Educational Programs
Develop targeted educational programs for case managers to enhance their understanding and acceptance of synchronous telerehabilitation.
Highlighting Convenience
Emphasize the travel convenience and accessibility benefits of telerehabilitation to address key decision-making factors.
Further Research
Conduct further research to document the advantages and disadvantages of telerehabilitation, especially regarding service quality and effectiveness as compared to clinic-based services.
Study Limitations
- 1[object Object]
- 2[object Object]
- 3[object Object]