Correction: Zhu et al. Gait Analysis with Wearables Is a Potential Progression Marker in Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1213

Brain Sci., 2023 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101429 · Published: October 8, 2023

Simple Explanation

This article is a correction to a previously published article regarding gait analysis with wearables as a potential marker for Parkinson's Disease progression. The correction addresses errors found in Table 3 of the original publication, specifically in rows 11-16 of column 6. The authors have stated that these corrections do not affect the overall scientific conclusions of the study.

Study Duration

Not specified

Participants

Not specified

Evidence Level

Not specified

Key Findings

1
Errors were identified in Table 3 of the original publication regarding correlation analysis between gait parameters and clinical measures in Parkinson's Disease.
2
Specific numerical corrections were made to values in rows 11-16 of column 6 in Table 3.
3
The corrected table provides revised correlation coefficients between gait parameters and H-Y stage, UPDRS scores, and PDQ39.

Research Summary

This article is a correction to a previously published study on gait analysis in Parkinson's disease. Errors were identified in Table 3. The errors occurred during data entry for rows 11-16 in column 6 of Table 3, and the corrected table is provided in this article. The authors emphasize that the scientific conclusions of the original study remain unchanged despite these corrections.

Practical Implications

Data Accuracy

Ensures the accuracy of data presented in the original publication, maintaining the integrity of the research.

Reliability of Findings

Reassures readers that the core findings of the original study are still valid despite the identified errors.

Transparency

Demonstrates transparency and commitment to correcting errors in published research.

Study Limitations

1
The article is solely a correction and does not present new data or analyses.
2
The correction is limited to specific numerical errors in Table 3.
3
The impact of the corrected values on secondary analyses or interpretations is not explicitly addressed.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology