Degree of Contribution of Motor and Sensory Scores to Predict Gait Ability in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Ann Rehabil Med, 2017 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.6.969 · Published: December 1, 2017
Simple Explanation
This study aimed to prioritize the motor and sensory variables to expect the ability to walk in patients with incomplete SCI. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with SCI admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of CHA Bundang Medical Center between March 2014 and February 2015. Patients were allocated into ambulator and non-ambulator groups based on Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) item 12 measuring indoor mobility as scores between 0 to 8 with higher score indicating better ambulation capacity
Key Findings
- 1Motor and sensory scores were significantly different between the ambulators and non-ambulators. The majority was associated to the function of lower extremities.
- 2Calculation of area under ROC curves (AUC) revealed that strength of hip flexor (L2) (AUC=0.905, p<0.001) and knee extensor (L3) (AUC=0.820, p=0.006) contributed the greatest to independent walking.
- 3hip flexor strength (L2) was the single most powerful predictor of ambulation by the logistic regression analysis (odds ratio=6.3, p=0.049), and the model fit well to the data.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Rehabilitation Goal Setting
Focus rehabilitation efforts on improving hip flexor and knee extensor strength in patients with incomplete SCI.
Prognostic Tool
Use hip flexor strength as a key predictor of ambulation potential in this patient population.
Compensatory Mechanisms
Recognize the role of hip flexors in compensating for distal muscle weakness during gait.
Study Limitations
- 1The criteria for patient selection included a broad range of disease-affected period.
- 2The etiology for spinal cord injury was not completely homogeneous and included trauma, tumor, inflammation, and spinal stenosis.
- 3The dichotomous outcome from SCIM item 12 adopted in this study is limited as the assessment does not provide information of various aspects of locomotor ability.