Development of community participation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2021 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1955204 · Published: January 1, 2021
Simple Explanation
This research focuses on improving the quality of rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries (SCI/D) to help them participate more fully in their communities. The SCI-High Project developed indicators to measure structure, process, and outcomes related to community participation within the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. A working group of experts defined community participation and reviewed existing research to identify factors that influence participation. They created a diagram to visually represent these factors and then selected specific indicators to track progress and improvement. The selected indicators include the availability of transition living settings, therapeutic community outings, weekend passes home, and measures of self-efficacy and reintegration into normal life. These indicators aim to inform whether rehabilitation programs are effectively improving community participation for individuals with SCI/D.
Key Findings
- 1The study identified a structure indicator: the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation programs with availability of a transition living setting/independent living unit.
- 2The process indicators included the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients who experienced: (a) a therapeutic community outing prior to rehabilitation discharge; and, (b) those who received a pass to go home for the weekend.
- 3The intermediary and final outcome measures are the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Quality Improvement
The indicators can be used by rehabilitation programs to identify areas for improvement in supporting community participation for individuals with SCI/D.
Policy Development
The indicators can inform policy decisions related to resource allocation and service delivery for SCI/D rehabilitation.
Research Advancement
Longitudinal data collected using these indicators can be used to advance research on the factors influencing community participation and the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions.
Study Limitations
- 1The indicators have not yet been piloted.
- 2The Working Group lacked a stakeholder perspective from family caregivers.
- 3Geographic discrepancies across Canadian rehabilitation sites may require more flexibility on how the structure and/or process indicators are recorded.