Effectiveness of electroacupuncture (EA) for the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI): A protocol of systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Medicine, 2020 · DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021077 · Published: July 24, 2020

Alternative Medicine Neurology Rehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study aims to evaluate how well electroacupuncture (EA) works for treating urinary incontinence (UI) in people who have spinal cord injuries (SCI). The researchers will look at various databases and sources to find relevant studies, without limiting the search by language or publication date. The study will follow strict guidelines for selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing the quality of the studies to ensure the review is reliable.

Study Duration

Not specified

Participants

SCI patients who were diagnosed as UI

Evidence Level

Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Key Findings

1
This study will summarize the most recent evidence to assess the effectiveness and safety of EA for the treatment of UI in patients with SCI.
2
The results of this study will provide helpful evidence to determine whether EA is effective and safety for the treatment of UI in patients with SCI or not.
3
The study expects to publish its findings in a peer-reviewed journal.

Research Summary

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for treating urinary incontinence (UI) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The review will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and will comprehensively search multiple electronic databases and other resources without language or publication date restrictions. The study will use Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment and RevMan 5.3 software for statistical analysis, providing a robust evaluation of the evidence.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

The results of this review can inform clinical practice by providing evidence-based guidance on the use of EA for UI in SCI patients.

Future Research

The findings can highlight areas where more research is needed to optimize EA treatment protocols.

Patient Care

This study may benefit patients by providing evidence to support the use of EA as a treatment option for UI following SCI.

Study Limitations

1
The review is limited to RCTs, potentially excluding other relevant study designs.
2
The heterogeneity of included studies may complicate data synthesis and interpretation.
3
The availability and quality of primary studies may impact the strength of the review's conclusions.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Alternative Medicine