Identification of Distinct Monocyte Phenotypes and Correlation with Circulating Cytokine Profiles in Acute Response to Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study
PM R, 2014 · DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.10.006 · Published: April 1, 2014
Simple Explanation
After a spinal cord injury (SCI), the body's immune system responds, and cells called macrophages infiltrate the injury site. These macrophages can be pro-inflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2). This study looks at monocytes (MOs), which are precursors to macrophages, in the blood of SCI patients. The goal was to see if the type of MOs present in the blood corresponds to the levels of inflammatory substances called cytokines. The study found that SCI patients had different types of MOs in their blood (either M1-dominant or M2-dominant), and these differences were linked to different levels of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines.
Key Findings
- 1Patients with SCI exhibit either M1-dominant or M2-dominant circulating monocytes (MOs), which are distinct from uninjured controls.
- 2The M1-dominant phenotype was associated with higher circulating levels of pro-inflammatory mediators IL-12p70 and IP-10, and lower levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10, IL-15 and IL-7.
- 3Patients with M2-dominant MOs exhibited higher levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-7.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Personalized Medicine
Identifying M1/M2 dominant phenotypes may facilitate future personalized medicine approaches by targeting a subset of SCI patients who are more likely to respond to immune-modulating therapy.
Biomarker Development
Circulating monocyte phenotype, correlated with inflammatory mediators, may be a feasible biomarker for evaluating SCI outcomes and treatments.
Therapeutic Targets
Modulating the immune response by targeting the M1/M2 balance may offer a new avenue for limiting secondary damage and promoting repair in traumatic SCI.
Study Limitations
- 1Small size of the SCI patient group
- 2Predominance of ASIA A/B SCI subjects
- 3Control subjects differed in gender