BMC Public Health, 2019 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7131-4 · Published: June 9, 2019
This study explores how to use the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the combined effect of health programs run by different community groups. The researchers looked at spinal cord injury peer mentorship programs in Canada to see how well the RE-AIM framework works for this type of evaluation. The study found it challenging to apply RE-AIM in this way due to differences in how each organization collected data and ran its programs.
Involve stakeholders from all participating organizations throughout the entire research process to ensure data reflects monitoring methods.
Understand each organization's funding model and its impact on programming to aid in developing universal indicators.
Include indicators applicable to some programs, even if not all, to capture a broader impact understanding.