Prioritization of risk situations in neuro‑urology: guidelines from Association Française d’Urologie (AFU), Association Francophone Internationale des Groupes d’Animation de la Paraplégie (A.F.I.G.A.P.), Groupe de Neuro‑urologie de Langue Française (GENULF), Société Française de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation (SOFMER) and Société Interdisciplinaire Francophone d’UroDynamique et de Pelvi‑Périnéologie (SIFUD‑PP)

The current health crisis has drastically impacted patient management in many fields, including neuro-urology, leading to a mandatory reorganization. The present work aimed to establish guidelines regarding the prioritization and optimal timing of each step of NLUTD management. This multidisciplinary collaborative work helped to establish recommendations which may be complementary with existing guidelines.

• 1
  Among the 206 initial items, 163 were selected and divided into four domains, diagnosis and assessment, treatment, follow-up, and complications, and two sub-domains, general and condition-specific.
• 2
  The guidelines on initial assessment are reported in Table 1 and supplementary material 6 and 7.
• 3
  By creating a comprehensive risk scale listing all relevant clinical situations encountered in neuro-urology, these recommendations would help clinicians to reorganize their patients' list in the long term with a personalized medicine approach, whatever is the situation.