Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2017 · DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0688-z · Published: June 8, 2016
This study looks at how emergency medical services (EMS) handle patients with potential spinal column injuries before they reach the hospital. It examines the characteristics of these patients, how EMS staff decide on and apply spinal immobilization techniques, and whether there are any negative effects from the immobilization process. The research involved analyzing data from blunt trauma patients with suspected spinal column injuries, focusing on patient characteristics, reasons for immobilization, immobilization methods, and any reported adverse effects during pre-hospital care. The study found that while spinal immobilization was generally applied based on valid criteria, there was a lack of consistency in how EMS staff interpreted 'distracting injuries.' Additionally, the reporting of adverse effects related to spinal immobilization was often incomplete in pre-hospital care reports.
The study highlights the need for a clearer, more consistent definition of 'distracting injury' to avoid unnecessary spinal immobilization.
EMS staff should improve their documentation of adverse effects related to spinal immobilization, ensuring more complete and reliable data collection.
A uniform EMS scoring system for motoric assessment should be developed to provide validated information on potential symptoms of SCI.