The Regenerative Effect of Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms and Pathways Underlying the Effect
Neurotherapeutics, 2020 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00915-5 · Published: August 27, 2020
Simple Explanation
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in permanent loss of motor and sensory functions, with no existing cure. This study explores repetitive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) as a noninvasive treatment to enhance tissue repair and functional recovery after SCI. The researchers used immunohistochemical techniques, behavioral tests, cell cultures, and proteomics to understand how rTSMS affects SCI in mice. They tested different lesion scenarios, including acute and chronic SCI phases in animals of different ages. The study's findings suggest that rTSMS can modulate the lesion scar by reducing fibrosis and inflammation, promoting the proliferation of spinal cord stem cells, decreasing demyelination, and ultimately leading to axonal regrowth, neuronal survival, and improved locomotor recovery.
Key Findings
- 1rTSMS modulates the lesion scar by decreasing fibrosis and inflammation, suggesting it promotes a more permissive environment for regeneration.
- 2rTSMS increases the proliferation of spinal cord stem cells, indicating a potential mechanism for endogenous repair and regeneration.
- 3rTSMS decreases demyelination, contributing to axonal regrowth, neuronal survival, and locomotor recovery after SCI, showing its neuroprotective effects.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Clinical Translation
rTSMS may offer a non-invasive therapeutic approach for SCI patients, potentially improving functional outcomes.
Targeted Therapy
Modulating scar formation and promoting stem cell proliferation can be key targets for SCI treatment strategies.
Rehabilitation Strategies
rTSMS could be integrated into rehabilitation programs to enhance recovery and improve the quality of life for SCI patients.
Study Limitations
- 1Rodent-specific TMS stimulator coils are lacking, inducing a lack of focality.
- 2Complete transection model is less relevant from a clinical point of view.
- 3The area stimulated was 1.5 cm2, meaning that 3–4 vertebral segments have been stimulated.