Triangulation of veteran and provider models of preventing community-acquired pressure injuries in spinal cord injury to reveal convergence and divergence of perspectives
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2024 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2135714 · Published: January 1, 2024
Simple Explanation
This study compares how healthcare providers and veterans with spinal cord injuries (SCI) perceive the prevention of community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPrI). It looks at areas of agreement and disagreement in their views. The research uses a method called Farmer triangulation to analyze existing models of CAPrI prevention from both provider and veteran perspectives, focusing on risks, resources, and preventive activities. The study found that while providers and veterans agree on the importance of basic care and support systems, they differ in their views on motivation, the veteran's role in prevention, and the adequacy of available supports.
Key Findings
- 1Providers and veterans agreed on the fundamentals of care and the importance of support from family, caregivers, and the healthcare system.
- 2Views diverged on motivation, with providers seeing a lack of it as a risk, while veterans viewed motivation as a resource stemming from fear, goals, faith, and family responsibility.
- 3There was dissonance regarding the prioritization of preventive activities versus social activities, with providers emphasizing prevention and veterans prioritizing living life while integrating preventive measures.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Patient-Centered Care
Tailor CAPrI prevention strategies to align with veterans' life goals and motivations rather than solely focusing on clinical guidelines.
Support Network Assessment
Assess and support veterans' informal networks of support, including family, friends, and community resources, to enhance preventive care.
Collaborative Problem-Solving
Engage veterans in collaborative problem-solving to address barriers to CAPrI prevention and ensure that recommendations are practical and effective in their daily lives.
Study Limitations
- 1The study included participants from only three VAs.
- 2Applicability of the results needs to be determined by the readers.
- 3Replication is needed in other populations.