Differential brain activity in patients with disorders of consciousness: a 3-month rs-fMRI study using amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation
Frontiers in Neurology, 2024 · DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1477596 · Published: December 13, 2024
Simple Explanation
This study investigates brain activity in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) using resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). It examines how brain activity, measured by amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), differs between patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and non-traumatic brain injury (non-TBI). The research also explores if ALFF can predict the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy in improving consciousness levels. By comparing ALFF patterns before and after SCS, the study aims to identify potential biomarkers for predicting treatment outcomes. The findings could help in better understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of consciousness and in developing more targeted therapies for patients with DoC, ultimately improving their chances of recovery and quality of life.
Key Findings
- 1Patients with TBI showed increased ALFF in the thalamus and anterior cingulate cortex, while the middle occipital lobe showed decreased ALFF.
- 2In the non-TBI group, a higher ALFF was noted in the precuneus, with a reduced ALFF in the occipital and temporal lobes.
- 3Patients with improved consciousness post-SCS exhibited distinct ALFF patterns compared with those with unchanged consciousness, particularly in the posterior cingulate and occipital regions.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Predictive Biomarker
ALFF in rs-fMRI can be used as a predictive biomarker to assess the likelihood of consciousness improvement following SCS therapy.
Targeted Therapy Development
Understanding differential ALFF patterns can guide the development of targeted therapeutic interventions for DoC patients.
Improved Patient Outcomes
By identifying potential for consciousness recovery, clinicians can optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Study Limitations
- 1Relatively small sample size
- 2Short follow-up period
- 3Absence of a control group