The Effect of Electrically Induced Cycling and Nutritional Counseling on Cardiometabolic Health in Upper and Lower Motor Neuron Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Dual Case Report
Int J Neurorehabil, 2019 · DOI: 10.4172/2376-0281.1000336 · Published: January 1, 2019
Simple Explanation
This study explores how electrically stimulated cycling, combined with nutritional advice, affects heart and metabolic health in people with long-term spinal cord injuries. It focuses on two types of injuries: those affecting the upper motor neurons (UMN) and those affecting the lower motor neurons (LMN). The study looks at body composition, blood vessel stiffness, and how the body handles glucose before and after the cycling and nutrition program. The results showed that both subjects experienced improvements in vascular stiffness and glucose levels, but these changes were more noticeable in the UMN-SCI case. The study suggests that while there might be some benefits for individuals with LMN-SCI, more research is needed.
Key Findings
- 1The LMN-SCI subject decreased body weight but increased body fat percentage, while the UMN-SCI subject had a minimal decrease in body weight and a decrease in body fat percentage.
- 2Both subjects showed a decrease in blood glucose and HbA1c levels, indicating improved glucose metabolism.
- 3Both subjects exhibited a decrease in markers of central vascular stiffness, but the changes were more pronounced in the UMN-SCI subject.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
FES Cycling Benefits
FES cycling, along with nutritional counseling, can potentially reverse metabolic and cardiovascular deterioration in individuals with long-standing UMN-SCI.
Passive Cycling Potential
Passive cycling may improve glucose deposition and vascular stiffness in individuals with LMN-SCI.
Further Research Needed
More comprehensive studies are required to explore the potential benefits of FES cycling and nutritional counseling on cardiometabolic health in both UMN-SCI and LMN-SCI populations.
Study Limitations
- 1The results cannot be generalized to the broader SCI population.
- 2Small sample size (two individuals).
- 3Gender was not matched between the two participants which is a potential confounder.