Ultra‑purified alginate gel implantation decreases inflammatory cytokine levels, prevents intervertebral disc degeneration, and reduces acute pain after discectomy
Scientific Reports, 2021 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79958-9 · Published: January 11, 2021
Simple Explanation
This study investigates a new treatment for back pain and disc degeneration after disc removal surgery (discectomy). The treatment involves implanting a special gel made from ultra-purified alginate (UPAL) into the damaged disc. The researchers tested this UPAL gel in rats and rabbits that had a procedure mimicking a discectomy. They looked at inflammation markers, nerve growth, and disc health. The results showed that the UPAL gel reduced inflammation, prevented disc degeneration, and lowered pain levels in the animals. This suggests that UPAL gel could be a promising treatment for people with back pain after discectomy.
Key Findings
- 1UPAL gel implantation suppressed TNF-α and IL-6 production in both rat and rabbit models of discectomy.
- 2UPAL gel downregulated TrkA expression, suggesting a reduction in nerve ingrowth and potentially discogenic pain.
- 3UPAL gel implantation inhibited IVD degeneration and reduced nociceptive behaviour in a rat caudal NP punch model.
Research Summary
Practical Implications
Potential New Treatment for Post-Discectomy Pain
UPAL gel implantation shows promise as a new treatment to reduce low back pain and prevent disc degeneration following discectomy.
Reduction of Inflammation and Nerve Ingrowth
The gel's ability to suppress inflammatory cytokines and downregulate TrkA expression suggests it can reduce inflammation and nerve ingrowth into the disc, key factors in discogenic pain.
Prophylactic Treatment for Discogenic Pain
By preventing IVD degeneration, UPAL gel implantation may serve as a prophylactic treatment for discogenic pain.
Study Limitations
- 1No direct causal relationship has been demonstrated between the reduced production of proinflammatory cytokines and reduced pain-related behaviours in the rat NP punch model.
- 2Rabbit models are not suitable for the assessment of pain-related behaviour because there are still no quantitative analysis methods available.
- 3It is unclear how the present behavioural nociception assays would be relevant to the human lumbar spine which has vastly different anatomy and where pain is not often provoked by direct stimulation.